Divine Foreknowledge, ch. 3

I recant on my statement from last chapter. This is the view I think is closest to my own. It's hard to argue with an intellectual powerhouse like William Lane Craig. His argumentation is sound, vetted and robust. Aside from his mental prowess, however, is a thoroughly Biblical and theological approach. Craig unpacks his defense through biblical, theological and philosophical arguments; the last of which he does most powerfully. I found it particularly interesting that the responses from each author affirmed Craig's position, at least in part. They seemed to be reticent to fully take on the firm foundation Craig has laid. Surely, with such varying views presented, they cannot all agree with him, though they all do. Similarly, I agree with him. I appreciate his care for the subject as well as his confession that this view cannot be vetted by Scripture, though it certainly does not conflict.