Divine Foreknowledge, ch. 2

David Hunt seems to spend more of his time arguing against other views than making a case for his own. Perhaps this is because the content of his view is more an acknowledgment of ignorance than embracing a particular position. I do not have a problem with that position; it most relates to my own. However, his arguments are lackluster and leave much to be considered. In the responses to Hunt's position, the authors are left with little response other than defending their own positions in light of Hunt's arguments against. I was most looking forward to this section, but found myself disappointed by Hunt's treatment.