A Matter of Days Summary
A Matter of Days had some shining moments, but all-in-all I was not impressed. I felt like the book had dual purpose and would have been more properly two books than one. At the end of the day, I agree with Ross in that we should welcome both young and old creationists into the fold of Christianity. I am neither opposed nor in disagreement with his assertion that an old-earth seems more likely. Though I believe his argumentation is weak at times, I walk away with a healthier view of the debate, an openness to new data, and a new desire to learn more.
I believe I have a healthier view of this debate. Entering into this, I would have argued that you can believe either young or old universe, but you are more likely to be correct if you believe in young. Upon reading, I am comfortable with either and believe that we should foster dialog. Having been through Kent Hovind's training on creation, I can see why someone like Ross would be frustrated by the style and presentation of some vocal YUCs.
I am also more open to new data. Ross offered some valuable insights that I have never considered. This is not an issue I have spent any amount of time exploring. So, it was good to read this book. It presented many arguments in a very disarming way seeking to connect rather than divide. Most of the time, this debate is heated, as Ross expresses. Having someone who desires dialog makes me want to know more.
I have a desire to learn more about young and old earth. From here, I would like to stay on top of new articles and research in the area of creation as it pertains to this subject. Science is one of the highest values of American culture. So, being aware and up-to-date on these issues is important for any Christian, theologian and pastor.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home